When I started university, I told myself to save all my projects. That way I could create a library of useful bits that I could use in later projects.
That was nearly a quarter of a century ago. Since then I’ve collected a projects folder of about 20 GB. This contains lots of duplicates, special purpose projects, and code that just doesn’t run anymore. (Software rot is real!)
Over the past couple of weeks, I started to go through my projects folder. And I found this little game, appar-ently written in October/November 2012 and I forgot about it until now. It’s written in Java 1.6, but still runs in java 15.
The controls are simple: use the right and left arrow to move the blocks. Esc to quit. Don’t let the blocks pile up too high. You get points for three or more connecting blocks (diagonal doesn’t count).
Every once in a while, I come across this little puzzle. I have no idea who made it, or what the intended answer is.
Usually there are a lot of people giving the same answer. And although that answer is reasonable, I don’t think it’s correct. When we modify the calculation to (x * y) + x, we’ll get the answers matching the question. But we’ll need to modify the calculation, and I don’t think that is needed.
Another solution would be to take the previous answer, and add the current sum.
There’s an old joke among nerds that goes like this:
There’s a hint in that joke that points to a different answer to the puzzle. You can write numbers in different ways. In computer science we use a couple of different number systems, like binary, or Base 2, which deals with the digits 0 and 1. That’s not the only system we use. There’s also octal (Base 8, digits 0 to 7) and hexadecimal (Base 16, digits 0 to 9 and A to F). And of course we still use decimal.
That joke about 10 kind of people, we can do better:
If we now go back to the puzzle, taking into account these number systems, we can arrive at a solution that doesn’t need to modify the calculation. We only need to modify the representation of the answer.
And there we have it, the answer is 13! Which is written in Base 3 as 111. There’s no need to modify the calculation. All we needed to do is change the representation of the answer.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.